Olinda Brazil (a Singaporean) wrote to Malaysiakini to complain about life in Singapore. You can read it here: I curse the day I was born a Singaporean
Her letter reminds me of a recent complaint I heard from a cab driver in Singapore:
The Government doesn’t care about us poor people. I invested my money in some financial package and when the subprime crisis hit, I lost money. I expect the government to force the banks to repay us but it did not…
I was taken aback. Here was a “poor” cab driver but with enough surplus money to invest (this itself speaks volumes about the wealth of Singaporeans). He wanted to “work” his money. By his own choice he invested in a financial deal. Had it not been for the subprime crisis, he would have made some money – which no doubt he will keep to himself.
Yet at the end of the day, like every other handout addicts I have met, they expect the government to bail them out of every black day they experience. They expect handouts even when it is not deserved.
Back to Brazil’s gripe:
In brief, Brazil complains about life as a citizen in Singapore.
Let’s see:
Let me provide an insight on how it is like to be a Singaporean. I must first stress that new immigrants or Permanent Residents (PRs) from Malaysia (like my parents) will not experience any disadvantages. It is the children of these people (like me) or new PRs’ children (who will be Singaporean) who will feel the disadvantages most sorely, and curse the fact they were born in Singapore
Waitaminit – why is it that the parents can make it but not the children? What has changed since? LKY was around then. He is still around today. So what is stopping Brazil from achieving the success of the parents?
My thoughts:
Immigrants (or newcomers) are known to be hardworking. Very competitive. However some “next generation” just want to live off the fruit of their parents. Has Brazil fallen into that trap? Or does Brazil expect blessings to simply fall down from the sky?
The typical Singaporeans that I know are hardworking. Yes there are those under-performers too but by and large, the population works hard – very hard. I know – a relative of mine gave up working in Singapore because, in her own words “you have to really work and not ‘bluff’ your way through”.
Brazil next says:
However, Singapore has problems at present because its development model is outdated
And we are supposed to take Brazil’s word for it…
The media prints only propaganda, the courts will always find the government blameless as the government runs 70% of the economy
Strong words but ones without basis or support. “Always”, “70%” without citing data.
As far as I tell from my research, the government had pursued its right in both domestic and international courts. It was the only opening for the government to correct perceptions. Like Tengku Razaleigh himself had or would have done (see here). The key issue is whether you can substantiate your assertion with facts.
…the common people are scared to death of arbitrary arrest
Here you can see Brazil’s obvious deep seated prejudice, to the extent of making a sweeping statement. The common people fearing arbitrary arrest?
This common cab driver apparently have utmost confidence in the Singapore Police Force. Relating the story of Manoha Pinot escape:
“We were worried that the police might not help us. So we asked the taxi driver how the police here worked,” said Asih.
“He told us that the police would definitely protect us regardless of who we were, whether we were foreigners or locals, whether we were rich or poor.”
I will not go further. To me Brazil’s piece is just a rant.
Probably from someone who could not make it to the top echelon. For whatever reason…
I sympathise with Brazil. But my advice to Brazil is – do some soul searching. Find your own lack and rectify it. Make yourself more marketable.
Unless, of course, you think that you will find a better place in Malaysia with whatever attitudes you currently carry with you. Though I am not sure Malaysia welcomes someone with excess baggage like yourself.
By the way, the money a Singapore Minister makes is much less than what he can pull if he had remained in the private sector. This group of high performers comprised of prominent economist, lawyers, doctors, etc.
The current law minister is an example – one of the top and well known lawyer taking a pay cut, just so that he can make a difference in the Justice Ministry.
Crap!
Recent Comments